Transport-window RFQ inputs

InputRequired project information
Window and glazingDrawing revision, visible area, mask, glass stack and emergency sightlines
MechanicalMounting zone, allowable depth, mass, cable exits and service route
ElectricalVehicle supply range, protection, grounding, controller location and interfaces
EnvironmentTemperature, EMC, shock, vibration, vehicle category and operating duty
ProgramPrototype quantity, validation ownership, pilot build and SOP target

A display or computer is offered with railway test evidence. Can it be placed inside a vehicle window and treated as a qualified assembly? The evidence must first be checked against the actual installation boundary. The display, controller, power conversion, cables, mounting and glazing may not be represented by the same test article.

An Arm Mbed forum request asks for an embedded display with railway compliance. That is a genuine component-selection question, but it does not resolve the additional requirements of a transparent window installation. This article is a proposed way to develop those requirements, not a vehicle approval or compliance declaration.

Rail window display architecture showing glazing, display, controller, vehicle power, data and service boundaries
The quotation boundary must separate the display, glazing, vehicle interfaces and validation responsibilities. Functional diagram; not to scale. Open full-size diagram. Scroll horizontally to inspect all blocks.

Draw the boundary around the supplied assembly

Identify the display head, controller, power converter, mounting parts, harnesses, glass/films/bonding and vehicle interfaces. Mark what VITREVIA supplies from China, what the vehicle integrator provides and which party accepts each boundary. A drawing with named owners is more useful than an unqualified “railway compliant” statement.

BoundaryQuestion before quotingEvidence required
Vehicle power → electronicsWhich input conditions, interruptions and protection requirements apply?Vehicle interface specification and applicable test configuration
Electronics → vehicle networkWhat information, timing and recovery behaviour are required?Protocol definition and interface test plan
Display → glass/mountingWhich assembly carries loads and controls tolerances?Controlled glazing/mounting drawings and qualification responsibility
Assembly → environmentWhich thermal, moisture, EMC and mechanical conditions apply?Applicable requirements, test levels and representative sample definition
System → maintenanceCan the unit be removed and restored without an undocumented process?Access study, replacement procedure and configuration record

Read a test report as a configuration record

Check the tested sample identity, hardware revision, software state, fixtures, cable arrangement, operating modes, test method, severity, performance criteria and recorded deviations. Confirm how the report maps to the proposed installation. Do not assume that a report for the controller covers a different power converter or a display laminated into a window.

IEC 60571 addresses electronic equipment used on rolling stock; IEC 61373 addresses shock and vibration; IEC 62236-3-2 addresses apparatus EMC. Their scopes are distinct. Public catalogue summaries identify subject matter but do not replace the full standards or the project’s qualification plan. Applicable editions, categories and limits must be confirmed by the accountable project authority.

Separate optical feasibility from qualification

First prove that the passenger can read the intended information against the changing view. Test the display-off state, day/night scenes, reflections and sightlines. Then assess the released assembly against the required mechanical, environmental, electrical and material requirements.

Emergency information, glazing safety, fire performance and vehicle approval must be assigned explicitly where applicable. A transparent display concept does not establish an approved emergency exit or substitute for required safety information. Requirements depend on the vehicle, location, function and jurisdiction.

Use four release gates

  1. Feasibility prototype: establish geometry, optical result, controller space, power concept and service access. Record which parts are provisional.
  2. Qualification configuration: freeze the agreed sample, drawings, BOM, software, fixtures and test plan before qualification testing.
  3. Vehicle pilot: verify installation tolerances, actual routes, vehicle interfaces, cleaning, passenger sightlines and maintenance.
  4. Production release: close deviations and release the evidence, inspection criteria and change-control responsibilities.

Make open inputs visible in the quotation

Use an assumptions register with an owner and closure date for each missing drawing, category, interface or approval. Distinguish feasibility pricing from a released production quotation. A glass build, adhesive, bracket, cable route or converter change after testing needs impact assessment; the accountable team decides whether additional testing is required.

A useful RFQ therefore includes the vehicle program, application, drawings, glazing responsibility, power/network interfaces, operating conditions, qualification requirements, quantities and release schedule. This gives the engineering team a defined scope and an evidence plan before a promise is made.

Technical sources

About this guide: Use these project checks with acceptance limits agreed for the supplied configuration. VITREVIA supplies and integrates display systems directly from Shenzhen, China.

Download the editable test record (.txt)

Project checklist

Related product and project pages

Engineering foundations